On Wednesday, President Trump signed an executive order that opened up a review of 25 national monuments, potentially setting the stage for Secretary of the Interior. Watch free 600 Free Live TV Channels. See 45000 Complimentary movies TV shows and documentaries. Record Local TV zero cost. View Horror Movies at no charge! 9781419693434 1419693433 Alone Boy, Bradley Huff 9780953215867 0953215865 Architecture & Commerce 9780153364747 0153364742 Harcourt Math Practice Workbook, Grade 2. News, Sports, Weather, Traffic and the Best of Baltimore. The PoliceOne Law Enforcement Topics section provides current news, resources and information on topics that are critical to law enforcement officers. Time to ditch antiquated media regulations. Posted. March 1. 1, 2. Our media regulations are stuck in the 1. Chris Berg writes. It is incredible to think the Australian government imposes largely the same regulations on media ownership that it did in the 1. Waves of change in Australia's economic system have come and gone in that time. Not to mention technologies. Indeed, television was in its experimental infancy when the first broadcasting ownership limits were imposed. Statutory Rule 1. How different a world was it? When a joint parliamentary committee examined Australia's broadcasting regulations seven years later, the other big topic was whether to nationalise the commercial broadcasters outright. It is fundamentally absurd that the same restrictions, based on the very same arguments, are being applied to our media- rich world as were being applied to the media- constrained world of 1. The 1. 94. 2 parliamentary report spoke of . Diversity is the one thing we now have in spades. The head of the press council, Julian Disney, even complains of the . As a consequence, the mainstream media still leads the discussion. The reasoning seems to be something like this: you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink. The patronising paternalism of this argument should be obvious - as should be the implicit suggestion that the real media diversity problem is that Australians don't want media diversity. But it is not novel to point out that the internet has made all the old arguments for media ownership restrictions into laughable anachronisms. ![]() ![]() ![]() At Crikey, Bernard Keane and Glenn Dyer are right: It's hard for the Government to claim it's purely motivated by digital libertarianism in media ownership considering it also has plans for a social media censorship scheme and a . The business is built almost entirely on rent- seeking. You can bet there's a stream of media lobbyists filing in and out of parliament house every day. The media firms know exactly what they hope to get out of the next round of regulatory change. The deals have probably already been made. None of that has changed since media ownership laws were last seriously revisited under the Howard government in 2. The arrival of new online media firms was slightly more hypothetical eight years ago, but it was pretty obvious which way the wind was blowing. What has changed since 2. The slow erosion of newspaper profitability has become rapid disintegration. In 2. 01. 2, Fairfax announced it was shedding an incredible 1. News Limited has been a bit more circumspect but the job losses are huge there as well. Industry consolidation may be the only way to save some of our legacy media outlets. The loss of classified advertising revenue makes the idea of a free- standing, traditionally- structured, independently- profitable newspaper a thing of the past. There has never been a more important time to ensure that the industry is institutionally flexible - capable of experimenting with ownership structures and capable of forming new alliances if necessary. As Michelle Grattan puts it, there are big prizes about. And this is a sector that has found few prizes in recent years. The irony is the 1. In the 1. 93. 0s and '4. Now that fear has been completely, irreversibly realised. Why keep ownership regulations that were so manifestly designed for another age? Chris Berg is policy director at the Institute of Public Affairs. Follow him at twitter. View his full profile here. Topics: media. information- and- communication. ![]() ![]() ![]() One day, at the height of her fame in the mid-Seventies, Jane Fonda turned up on the doorstep of her ex-husband, Roger Vadim. She was lugging a bulging sack.![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |